Architecture 2030 Districts Reduce Energy, Voluntarily
While some cities are requiring mandatory energy benchmarking from large commercial buildings, a program in which building owners voluntarily join together to participate in energy reduction is catching on in a few cities.
Architecture 2030, which originally instigated a “building district” in Seattle to reduce energy and water usage, has recently inspired Cleveland and Pittsburgh to create Architecture 2030 Districts.
Through the 2030 Districts, building owners and other partners agree to: carbon-neutrality for new buildings; a 50 percent reduction in energy and water use for existing buildings; and a 50 percent reduction in vehicle miles traveled, all by 2030.
Seattle’s central business district was the first 2030 District, and it is led by businesses and building owners, rather than a government mandate, according to an article on The Kresge Foundation site.
The Seattle 2030 District’s membership includes property owners, building managers, city officials, public utilities and professional organizations, and the district is on track to hit its first benchmark – 10 percent reductions by 2015, as reported by Kresge.
Rather than requiring each individual building to meet all the Architecture 2030 District’s goals, each building contributes what it can. “So the secured bike storage in one building’s parking ramp helps move the district toward its transportation goals, while the lighting retrofit in an office tower contributes to the carbon reduction goal, and the satellite-controlled irrigation system in the outdoor garden plazas of another property contribute to the goal of saving water,” according to Kresge.
In February, the Pittsburgh 2030 District announced four more partners: Heinz Field, US Steel Tower, properties of Point Park University and the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.
In Boston, the Greater Boston Real Estate Board and The Building Owners and Managers Association commissioned a report that concluded mandatory energy monitoring and benchmarking are not worth the cost. Both groups oppose an initiative by Boston’s mayor to require mandatory benchmarking.
- Top 3 Reasons to Calculate Your Environmental Footprint
- 2014 Environmental Leader Product and Project Awards
- Integrating sustainability into your ERM framework
- How to Use Lean Tools to Cash In On Environmental and Energy Savings
- NAEM Research Report: Planning for a Sustainable Future
- Alarms Management: The Future is Now
- Sustainability Reporting for Commercial Real Estate: GRESB
- The CFO and the Sustainability Reporting Chain
- The Guru’s Guide: Implementing Environmental ERP Systems
- Sustainability Careers: Unlocking Hidden Employment Potential
- Energy Efficiency Requires Engineering Efficiency
- Integrated Building Optimization: A Crucial Convergence of Demand-side and Supply-Side Energy Management Strategies
- Driving Productivity and Profit with Industrial Energy Management
- Energy Procurement in 2014: Products & Programs to Optimize Savings
- BUYING STRATEGIES IN A VOLATILE MARKET: What Businesses Need to Know about Retail Electricity Procurement