Buildings’ Energy Savings Potential Can Range from 3-41%
The energy-savings potential of a building is not equal across all buildings in a large portfolio, but buildings with the highest potential have an average energy-saving opportunity of 41 percent, according to a report from energy auditing software maker Retroficiency.
In the worst case, the savings opportunity is only 3 percent. Because of this range, organizations can benefit from prioritizing buildings with the greatest efficiency opportunities to meet goals and maximize their return, the company said.
The report, “Building Energy Efficiency Opportunity,” analyzes data from 500 randomly selected energy audits completed on Retroficiency’s Building Efficiency Intelligence platform.
Among its findings, the report finds that Energy Star and EUI building performance benchmarking systems should not necessarily be used to prioritize buildings based on their energy efficiency savings potential.
This is because Energy Star aims to rate building performance while factoring in use type, size, location, and other operational and asset characteristics. A high rating indicates a lower potential for efficiency improvements that will show a return on investment.
The EUI system, which measures energy consumption per square foot, is best applied when comparing buildings of the same use type. But offices with high EUIs are likely to have data centers. These data centers may have more limited savings opportunities, Retroficiency said.
The report also found that end uses that consume a small proportion of energy can offer large savings. For example, lighting, a common focus of energy efficiency projects because of its potential to provide a quick payback, accounts for a relatively small portion of current end-use consumption across most use types.
In contrast, about 50 percent of energy consumption stems from HVAC systems, but the proportion of HVAC-based savings do not always reach the 50 percent mark. Savings is not always aligned with the proportion of consumption, Retroficiency said.
Among its recommendations Retroficiency said that annual building savings can significantly increase if owners or managers are willing to raise their payback thresholds. For every one year increase from the mid-term to the long-term package, buildings could save an incremental 2.1 percent/year of energy.
- NAEM Trends Report: Planning for a Sustainable Future
- How to Automate the Collection & Delivery of Utility Billing Data
- Alarms Management: The Future is Now
- What You Need to Know About Demand Charges
- 2014 Energy and Sustainability Predictions: Findings from Leading Professionals
- Evaluation Guide: Four Steps to a Successful Lighting Evaluation
- How "Fixed" is the Fixed Price Product?
- Descriptive, Predictive, Prescriptive: Transforming Asset and Facilities Management with Analytics
- An Integrated Approach to Managing Today's Energy and Utility Assets
- EHS Managers: The Evolution from Necessary Evil to Vital Leaders
- BUYING STRATEGIES IN A VOLATILE MARKET: What Businesses Need to Know about Retail Electricity Procurement
- Smart Building Technology: The Key to Comprehensive Building Performance
- What Energy Managers Need to know about Procuring Natural Gas: Guidance for 2014 Natural Gas Contracts
- Energy Optimization from the Boiler Room to the Board Room
- Your Roadmap for Energy Management: First Stop – Myths & Realities of Energy Purchasing