Retail Energy Buyer

Subscribe to the free weekly newsletter written just for retail energy buyers

Electricity from Renewables Cost Competitive with Coal

November 26, 2014 By Linda Hardesty

windAlthough a recent story from Spectrum IEEE said Google researchers gave up on a project to produce electricity from renewables more cheaply than electricity from coal, a story in the New York Times says some renewable electricity is already cost competitive with coal.

The story cites a study by the investment banking firm Lazard, which finds the cost of utility-scale solar is as low as 5.6 cents per kWh, and wind is as low as 1.4 cents, while natural gas comes in at 6.1 cents and coal at 6.6 cents. However, solar and wind benefit from subsidies. But without subsidies, Lazard finds solar would cost about 7.2 cents per kWh and wind would cost 3.7 cents, both still cheaper than coal or natural gas.

In Texas, Austin Energy signed a deal this spring for 20 years of output from a solar farm at less than 5 cents per kWh. In September, the Grand River Dam Authority in Oklahoma announced its approval of a new agreement to buy power from a new wind farm expected to be completed next year. Grand River estimated the deal would save its customers roughly $50 million from the project, says the NY Times.

The article also mentions the “hidden costs” of both renewables and fossil fuels. Solar and wind produce power intermittently, which requires backup systems. And of course, traditional fossil-fuel power plants emit carbon, which results in environmental costs.

Photo: Wind turbines via Shutterstock

One comment on “Electricity from Renewables Cost Competitive with Coal

  1. When the Google engineers who made the declaration about renewables not sufficient enough to stop global warming made their statement, I don’t think they were just talking about electricity but rather all types of power generation including – and probably specifically – fuel for transportation

Leave a reply


*