Stanford’s New Energy Plant Helps Cut Water use by 15%
A new central energy facility at Stanford University is helping the school cut its water use by 15 percent.
Stanford’s new energy plant operates efficiently in any weather condition, thanks to heat recovery chillers, hot and cold water thermal energy storage, and a patented smart technology system that uses weather and electricity pricing forecasts to optimize operations. The central plant system is a key component of the Stanford Energy System Innovations (SESI).
Johnson Controls worked with Affiliated Engineers to deliver a custom-engineered heat-recovery process that is 70 percent more efficient than the cogeneration process Stanford used since 1987. York heat-recovery chillers will meet more than 90 percent of campus heating demands by capturing almost two-thirds of the waste heat generated by the campus cooling system to produce hot water for the heating system.
Along with a Metasys building automation system, Johnson Controls developed the Enterprise Optimization System, a predictive control software system to optimize cost and energy use based on the 10-day weather forecast and future grid electricity prices. The software is designed to predict hourly campus heating and cooling needs, and then determine how to best run the heat recovery, heating, and cooling equipment inside. It also will determine how much hot and cold water to store in the central energy facility’s water thermal storage tanks for later use.
- 2015 Insider Knowledge
- 2016 Environmental Leader Product & Project Awards
- Advanced Rooftop-Unit Control (ARC) Retrofits: Field Demonstrations Validate Energy Savings
- Improve Occupant Comfort & Reduce Energy Costs Through Humidity Control
- 2016 Energy and Sustainability Predictions Findings from Facilities Professionals
- The New Energy Future - Challenges and Opportunities in Corporate Energy Management
- Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
- Building Energy Benchmarking & Transparency Laws
- Let's Do The Math for DR
- Shifting the Focus from End-of-Life Recycling to Continuous Product Lifecycles