University of Delaware Nixes CHP Data Center Project
The University of Delaware (UD) has put a halt to a plan to develop a data center on the university’s Science, Technology & Advanced Research (STAR) Campus, after it conducted a study finding that the proposed combined heat and power (CHP) plant for the data center would be too large and emit too much greenhouse gases.
During the spring and summer of 2013, information from TDC suggested that its plans were evolving with greater emphasis on power generation and selling excess energy to the grid, so the provost assigned a working group, made up of UD faculty and administrative leaders, to review TDC’s plan.
After investigating the quality of the facility plans, the size of the power plant and the potential effects of resulting greenhouse gases and other pollutants on the environment, the group made the following key findings:
- A data center would be advantageous to the STAR Campus, with the potential to provide research and internship opportunities, enhance the property infrastructure to attract other tenants and provide construction and permanent jobs and provide tax revenue for local schools and community.
- Contemporary high-quality data centers use the existing grid or deploy a combination of the existing grid and renewable energy generation to meet their power needs. This approach appears to be advantageous on many grounds: reliability, economic and environmental.
- Relative to other fossil-fuel energy sources, the CHP facility TDC proposed is an efficient and viable transitional energy generation technology. However, its efficiency is predicated on being appropriately sized such that the recovered heat can be used or sold throughout the year as useful energy. It was not clear that this would be the case with TDC’s plan, particularly in the non-summer months.
- The cogeneration facility that TDC proposed is at least two times larger than any other on-site power generation facility known at data centers in the United States.
- Significant generation of greenhouse gases with insufficient plans to capture and sequester carbon dioxide and the emission of other pollutants would have negative effects on UD’s commitments to sustainability and reducing its carbon footprint.
The Working Group concluded that the proposed facility is not consistent with a first-class science and technology campus and high-quality development to which UD is committed.
The findings are detailed in the Group’s report.
- Existing Building Technologies Combine for Increased Savings
- How to Use Lean Tools to Cash In On Environmental and Energy Savings
- Sustainability Careers: Unlocking Hidden Employment Potential
- Top 3 Reasons to Calculate Your Environmental Footprint
- Sustainability Reporting for Commercial Real Estate: GRESB
- Six Essential Steps to Drive Effective Energy Management
- Integrated Building Optimization
- 4 Reasons Operations Teams Can’t Live Without Real-Time Building Data
- Essential Guide to Lighting Retrofits and Upgrades
- 2014 Environmental Leader Product and Project Awards
- Cut Costs and Improve Facility Operations with Energy Data
- Energy Procurement Strategies for Winter 2014 and 2015
- Energy Efficiency Requires Engineering Efficiency
- Integrated Building Optimization: A Crucial Convergence of Demand-side and Supply-Side Energy Management Strategies
- Driving Productivity and Profit with Industrial Energy Management