Public Worries About Shale Gas Fracking

Americans are not opposed to more domestic energy production, but they are unwilling to achieve it by sacrificing clean water, increased energy efficiency, and expanded wind and solar power in the process, according to a new ORC International survey conducted for the nonprofit Civil Society Institute (CSI) and Environmental Working Group (EWG).

The telephone poll was conducted December 26-29, 2012 with of 809 adults 18 years of age and older, living in the continental United States. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percent. Key poll findings include:

  • Three quarters of Americans have heard of fracking, with 51 percent saying they are very or somewhat familiar with it. 79 percent of Americans are concerned about fracking “as it relates to water quality.”
  • 62 percent of Americans oppose “expanding US production of shale gas for use by other nations” first before the health research is done, as recommended recently by more than 100 US health professionals. This approach is supported by about half (49 percent) of Republicans, and over two thirds of Independents and Democrats, at 67 percent and 69 percent, respectively.
  • 86 percent of Americans “support more studies of the health and environmental consequences of the chemicals” used in fracking. Supporters of this approach include 81 percent of Republicans, 84 percent of Independents, and 89 percent of Democrats.
  • 88 percent of Americans want leadership when it comes to exercising caution on exporting energy – such as natural gas – that could boost China and other economies, but hurt US consumers by raising energy and manufacturing costs at home. Nearly identical support levels were seen here along partisan lines: 88 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Independents, 87 percent of Democrats.

Key survey findings on broad energy issues include:

  • 94 percent of Americans – including 92 percent of Republicans, 87 percent of Independents, and 98 percent of Democrats – want political leadership on balancing calls for more energy production in US with protecting clean water and air.
  • 91 percent of Americans feel it is important that their member of Congress demonstrate leadership on a “national agenda for clean energy and protecting America’s water and air.” The vast majority of Republicans (85 percent), Independents (87 percent), and Democrats (96 percent) agree on the need for such leadership.
  • 92 percent of Americans think “U.S. energy planning and decision making” should be based on “a comprehensive understanding of what our national water resources are” – a national water roadmap that Congress asked for, but which was never produced. The national water roadmap attracts the support of 92 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Independents, and 94 percent of Democrats.
  • 86 percent of Americans want leadership on shifting from coal and nuclear energy to wind and solar. Support for this approach exists across party lines, including 72 percent of Republicans, 83 percent of Independents, and 97 percent of Democrats.
Energy Manager Today Product & Project Awards 2018
Sponsored By: Energy Manager Today

Avoid the RFP Trap: The Smart Guide to Purchasing EHS Software
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

Practical Guide to Transforming Energy Data into Better Buildings
Sponsored By: Lucid

Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS


2 thoughts on “Public Worries About Shale Gas Fracking

  1. Several new aspects to shale gas have come to light –

    1) the USGS has downgraded the Marcellus shale capacity projections from 27 years of gas supply to 6 07 years of capacity.

    2) Extraction rate is slower – meaning we will not get the same flow out these wells as “regular” wells.

    3) NOAA recently confirmed a previous report that methane leak rates from these fields are between 4 – 9% – which erases ALL the green / climate change benefit and then some of using this fuel.

    So IMHO we need to look elsewhere now, and keep this source of fuel on the backburner so to speak.

  2. If fracked oil was being used in high value end uses, – spectacle lenses, ecoprotection measures, habitat restoration, precision agriculture…perhaps…. but so that people can drive to malls and waddle around the shops buying things that nobody needs… I don’t think so.

Leave a Comment

User Name :
Password :
If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now
Translate »